Chronology and contradiction matrix
Events in date order. Statements side by side.
Which one do you need
| Case chronology | Contradiction matrix | |
|---|---|---|
| The question | What happened, and in what order? | Where do this witness's statements conflict? |
| Works from | Medical records, emails, statements and other dated files | Transcripts, declarations and other statements by one witness |
| You get | One timeline as a PDF and an Excel sheet, each entry cited to its source file and page | A two-column PDF pairing each statement with the one it conflicts with, each with its citation |
Case chronology
Medical records, emails, and statements arrive out of order. Building the timeline by hand takes days of paralegal time, billed to your client.
We read the files you send on hardware we own in Hawaiʻi, pull the dated events, and put them in one sequence, however the dates were written.
You get a PDF and an Excel sheet. Every entry cites its source file and page. We review every chronology before it goes out, and you can check any entry before it goes into a motion or a trial binder.
Contradiction matrix
Checking today's testimony against a declaration from two years ago means reading both closely, then doing it again for every other statement. For a key witness, that's days of associate time, and the shift that matters is easy to miss.
We index the transcripts and documents you send on the same hardware. Then we compare what the witness said about the facts that tend to move: dates, times, distances, speeds, and who did what.
You get a two-column PDF. Each row pairs a statement with the one it conflicts with, and each carries its page-and-line or document citation. We review every matrix before it goes out. Whether a row is a real inconsistency or a bad question is your call.